Downhill Bike Helmets

In cities, as in nature, the downhill bike helmets helmet is not compulsory. Nevertheless have, it is vital for any flight security whether a simple walk around your neighborhood or a ledge in the mountain bike. Indeed, the statistics are clear. In competitions which the helmet was made compulsory in t all disciplines that make up the cycling. This article Retailer everything about us is on the march downhill bike helmets helmet. To consume any security follow the guide. Although qu'tant a means of transport most, if not THE most sr srs, the downhill bike helmets may be the cause of falls can cause severe physical damage. Introduces beginners to the 1980s, the protective reinforcement of skull prtait mockery in Europe while silent dj adopted in the United States. If he suffers a shock, the helmet is more reliable. And even if it does not look damaged it does not fawn being protected optimum.
At its General Assembly held on October 11, 1997 in La Corua, institutions and associations that comprise the Coordinator in Defense of the bike, ConBici, have agreed as follows. We express our strong opposition to the proposal to impose mandatory use of downhill bike helmets for cyclists on long distance routes, such as contained in the report of the presentation of the Congress on this issue, for the following reasons. If the riskiest form of cycling, career, is released from the helmet law is absurd nonsense intended to require other users to wear helmets, citing security concerns. If careers are regulated by internal rge, the outputs are organized by the club or federation organizing and tours of the children by their parents, there is no further need for a legislative measure. According to official data from the Directorate General of Traffic, the majority of cyclists killed have been truly "killed" by a car as they drove by wide roads in conditions of good visibility and straight, without the cyclist having committed any offense. DGT also signal that the impact of a car at 46. 5 km / h delivers a force capable of raising the rider at the height of a 13 floor, after which the question of whether wearing or not wearing a helmet is laughable. The helmet does not prevent an accident. Meanwhile, according to a European Union study, a decrease of the speed of cars in just 5 km / h would reduce road deaths by 25%. As you can mitigate the consequences of an accident, the helmet is equally or even more effective for the occupants of cars and, especially, pedestrians, and one of 4 pedestrians injured in road dies, according to the DGT . In absolute numbers, helmet use could save many more lives of motorists - which, incidentally, are obliged to take on professional careers - that of cyclists. It is also shown that, in its entirety, the benefits of moderate cycling for the health of the individual, the environment, and the public health budget far outweigh the risks and costs of an accident. The government of Denmark has recently decided, in view of these and other arguments, ruling out any mandatory bicycle helmet. In no EU country helmet is not compulsory for professional cycling. Where helmet use is mandatory, for example in Australia and New Zealand has fallen as a result of this measure the number of cyclists 30 to 40%, has declined only slightly or remained the number of serious injuries the registered head injury. During this time, also have dropped over 30% of head injuries for pedestrians - who are not required to wear downhill bike helmets - but this has happened thanks to the campaigns against alcohol and excessive speed motorists. The Capital Territory Supreme Court of Australia has recognized the fact that now there are fewer cyclists without having lowered the accident rate behavior for the next person using the downhill bike helmets at an increased risk of falling victim to an accident. making it untenable as a helmet law to increase road safety for cyclists. If the imposition of mandatory bicycle helmet, would be inevitable that there may also individual attitudes and collective civil disobedience against the measure, which would not serve the interests of road safety and their image in public opinion . That meets our thinking and to discard the helmet law for cyclists, both urban and interurban roads. We are available to extend this and other information related to the cycling and road safety for cyclists. . .
.